The musings of the great human philosophers have often gravitated toward the illusivity of natural language. With the coining of the brilliant Cartesian
The investigative feeding frenzy spawned by Descartes has been sustained to the very present day, although its height cannot be denied to have been attained with the advent of the serendipitous discovery by Bloomfield of the notorious sein/dasein/nichtsein distinction. This tri-
Nor can the contributions of behaviorism properly be ignored; for Skinner had in mind a system whereby language--
That langue and parole are the issue also must not be forgotten, but Saussure's significatum itself declined in significance as more structurally-
Contemporary approaches, such as those of Wittgenstein and Labov, have without questions made widely traversable inroads; but the ancient issues remain essentially unaddressed. It seems unlikely that the "insights" of the new breed of researcher will prove, ultimately, of much eschatological significance.
Modern philologists have a justifiable right to expect more of their leaders than the regurgitations of classical work that repeatedly rear their heads. Where, then, are the thinkers of our day?

Classifying an Andean Language--Rodrigo Diaz

Tagmemics of Stratificationalism--R.W. Jackson

Babel Vol I, No 2 Contents