<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<rss xmlns:itunes='http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd' version='2.0' xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<channel>

<title>Speculative Grammarian Podcast</title>
<link>http://specgram.com/</link>
<description>Speculative Grammarian—the premier scholarly journal featuring research in the neglected field of satirical linguistics—is now available as a somewhat irregular audio podcast.</description>
<copyright>Speculative Grammarian</copyright>
<language>en-us</language>
<atom:link href="http://specgram.com/podcast.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<itunes:summary>Speculative Grammarian, the premier scholarly journal featuring research in the neglected field of satirical linguistics, is now available as a somewhat irregular audio podcast.</itunes:summary>
<itunes:subtitle>Speculative Grammarian is the premier scholarly journal featuring research in the neglected field of satirical linguistics.</itunes:subtitle>
<itunes:keywords>speculative grammarian, specgram, linguistics, language, humor, satire, satirical linguistics, parody</itunes:keywords>
<itunes:author>Speculative Grammarian</itunes:author>

<itunes:owner>
<itunes:name>Speculative Grammarian</itunes:name>
<itunes:email>specgram@specgram.com</itunes:email>
</itunes:owner>
<itunes:image href='http://specgram.com/images/nav/sgpodcast.jpg' />
<itunes:category text='Science &amp; Medicine'>
<itunes:category text="Social Sciences"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Comedy"/>
<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>



<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:00:01 GMT</lastBuildDate>


<!--
    <item>
      <title>What is Linguistics Good For, Anyway?</title>
      <description>What is Linguistics Good For, Anyway?; An Advice Column by Jonathan “Crazy Ivan” van der Meer; From Volume CLV, Number 4 of Speculative Grammarian, February 2009. ——— The most commonly asked question of a linguist, when one’s secret is revealed, is (all together now!): “How many languages do you speak?” I’ve decided that a good answer to this question is π. More than three, less than four—though if you discover that your interlocutor is singularly unsophisticated or otherwise from Kansas, you can call it three to keep things simple.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://specgram.com/CLV.4/03.vandermeer.goodfor.html</link>
      <guid>http://specgram.com/podcasts/CLV.4-03-What-is-Linguistics-Good-For-Anyway.mp3</guid>
      <itunes:summary>What is Linguistics Good For, Anyway?; An Advice Column by Jonathan “Crazy Ivan” van der Meer; From Volume CLV, Number 4 of Speculative Grammarian, February 2009. ——— The most commonly asked question of a linguist, when one’s secret is revealed, is (all together now!): “How many languages do you speak?” I’ve decided that a good answer to this question is π. More than three, less than four—though if you discover that your interlocutor is singularly unsophisticated or otherwise from Kansas, you can call it three to keep things simple.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>speculative grammarian, satirical linguistics, linguistics, satire, humor, parody, linguistics, phonology, phonetics, accents</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:duration>6:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure url="http://specgram.com/podcasts/CLV.4-03-What-is-Linguistics-Good-For-Anyway.mp3" length="5958678" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
-->


<!--
    <item>
      <title>Subliminal Linguistics</title>
      <description>Subliminal Linguistics; By Trey Jones, at Rice University; From Volume CXLVII, Number 2, of Speculative Grammarian, February 1993. ——— The new field of subliminal linguistics questions whether or not it is possible that there are clues available to children for language acquisition which are not obvious to those who study the process, and which may occur below the level of conscious recognition, but nonetheless aid language acquisition.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://specgram.com/CXLVII.2/04.jones.subliminal.html</link>
      <guid>http://specgram.com/podcasts/CXLVII.2-04-Subliminal-Linguistics.mp3</guid>
      <itunes:summary>Subliminal Linguistics; By Trey Jones, at Rice University; From Volume CXLVII, Number 2, of Speculative Grammarian, February 1993. ——— The new field of subliminal linguistics questions whether or not it is possible that there are clues available to children for language acquisition which are not obvious to those who study the process, and which may occur below the level of conscious recognition, but nonetheless aid language acquisition.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>speculative grammarian, satirical linguistics, linguistics, satire, humor, parody, linguistics, language acquisition</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:duration>1:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure url="http://specgram.com/podcasts/CXLVII.2-02-The-Boustrophedon-Plummerfled-Hypothesis.mp3" length="1851271" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
-->


    <item>
      <title>The Boustrophedon-Plummerfled Hypothesis and Futurological Linguistics</title>
      <description>The Boustrophedon-Plummerfeld Hypothesis and Futurological Linguistics; by Jay Trones; From Volume CXLVII, Number 2 of Speculative Grammarian, February 1993. ——— Recently I found myself "fortunate enough to find such occasion" (Pyles &amp; Algeo, P.46) as to weasel the word 'boustrophedon' into a conversation. After having expounded on the many joyous properties of this word, I entreated my fellow conversational participant to remember the word, and attempt to become one of those few and proud who have used it casually in non-academia. In a subsequent discourse with my native English speaking informant, I asked her to recall the illustrious word. Her response was 'plummerfeld'.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://specgram.com/CXLVII.2/02.trones.boustrophedon.html</link>
      <guid>http://specgram.com/podcasts/CXLVII.2-02-The-Boustrophedon-Plummerfled-Hypothesis.mp3</guid>
      <itunes:summary>The Boustrophedon-Plummerfeld Hypothesis and Futurological Linguistics; by Jay Trones, of the Futurological Linguistics Association, Rice University; From Volume CXLVII, Number 2 of Speculative Grammarian, February 1993. ——— Recently I found myself "fortunate enough to find such occasion" (Pyles &amp; Algeo, P.46) as to weasel the word 'boustrophedon' into a conversation. After having expounded on the many joyous properties of this word, I entreated my fellow conversational participant to remember the word, and attempt to become one of those few and proud who have used it casually in non-academia. In a subsequent discourse with my native English speaking informant, I asked her to recall the illustrious word. Her response was 'plummerfeld'.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>speculative grammarian, satirical linguistics, linguistics, satire, humor, parody, linguistics, phonology, phonetics, syntax</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:duration>5:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure url="http://specgram.com/podcasts/CXLVII.2-02-The-Boustrophedon-Plummerfled-Hypothesis.mp3" length="4998466" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>The Tribesman</title>
      <description>The Tribesman; by Aya Katz &amp; Leslie Fish; From Volume CXLVII, Number 1 of  Speculative Grammarian, January 1993 —— Once a fieldworker hiked into unknown terrain, / Seeking someone to question, he came. / When he asked of the natives what language they spoke / There was one who was glad to explain. / Behind lay a linguist, as well as a saint, / Who would translate the Bible for them. / Would decipher the code of their language so quaint, / And secure for himself lasting fame.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://specgram.com/CXLVII.1/10.katz.tribesman.html</link>
      <guid>http://specgram.com/podcasts/CXLVII.1-10-The-Tribesman.mp3</guid>
      <itunes:summary>The Tribesman; by Aya Katz &amp; Leslie Fish; From Volume CXLVII, Number 1 of  Speculative Grammarian, January 1993 —— Once a fieldworker hiked into unknown terrain, / Seeking someone to question, he came. / When he asked of the natives what language they spoke / There was one who was glad to explain. / Behind lay a linguist, as well as a saint, / Who would translate the Bible for them. / Would decipher the code of their language so quaint, / And secure for himself lasting fame.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>speculative grammarian, satirical linguistics, linguistics, satire, humor, parody, linguistics, phonology, phonetics, accents</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:duration>4:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure url="http://specgram.com/podcasts/CXLVII.1-10-The-Tribesman.mp3" length="4172113" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>A 21st Century Proposal for English Spelling Reform</title>
      <description>A 21st Century Proposal for English Spelling Reform; by H. Sanderson Chambers III; From Volume CXLIX, Number 2 of Speculative Grammarian, January 2004. ——— As is well-known to all educated people—and if it’s not well-known to you, then you’re not one of us—the early part of the 20th century was the heyday of the Simplified Spelling movement, which sought to reform English spelling on the grounds that it was “mard by absurdities and inconsistencies”. So what, you might say? Well, among other things, the simplifiers claimed that the spelling system kept English from being adopted as an international language: “A language, in which to learn to spel imperfectly takes two ful years of scool-time in the countries where it is spoken, does not recommend itself to the forener as a convenient medium for conducting his relations with other foreners”.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:00:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://specgram.com/CXLIX.1/03.chambers.reform.html</link>
      <guid>http://specgram.com/podcasts/CXLIX.1-03-A-21st-Century-Proposal-for-English-Spelling-Reform.mp3</guid>
      <itunes:summary>A 21st Century Proposal for English Spelling Reform; by H. Sanderson Chambers III; From Volume CXLIX, Number 2 of Speculative Grammarian, January 2004. ——— As is well-known to all educated people—and if it’s not well-known to you, then you’re not one of us—the early part of the 20th century was the heyday of the Simplified Spelling movement, which sought to reform English spelling on the grounds that it was “mard by absurdities and inconsistencies”. So what, you might say? Well, among other things, the simplifiers claimed that the spelling system kept English from being adopted as an international language: “A language, in which to learn to spel imperfectly takes two ful years of scool-time in the countries where it is spoken, does not recommend itself to the forener as a convenient medium for conducting his relations with other foreners”.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>speculative grammarian, satirical linguistics, linguistics, satire, humor, parody, linguistics, spelling reform, orthography</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:duration>7:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure url="http://specgram.com/podcasts/CXLIX.1-03-A-21st-Century-Proposal-for-English-Spelling-Reform.mp3" length="7373854" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Reanalysis of Spanish by Naïve Linguists</title>
      <description>Reanalysis of Spanish by Naïve Linguists; by Chesterton Wilburfors Gilchrist, Jr.; From Volume CLV, Number 1 of Speculative Grammarian, September 2008. ——— While sitting in the Linguistics Lounge the other day, I overheard some first-year grad students discussing the day’s Spanish class. My eavesdropping turned out to be much more interesting than I had anticipated.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:00:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://specgram.com/CLV.1/05.gilchrist.naive.html</link>
      <guid>http://specgram.com/podcasts/CLV.1-05-Reanalysis-of-Spanish-by-Naive-Linguists.mp3</guid>
      <itunes:summary>Reanalysis of Spanish by Naïve Linguists; by Chesterton Wilburfors Gilchrist, Jr.; From Volume CLV, Number 1 of Speculative Grammarian, September 2008. ——— While sitting in the Linguistics Lounge the other day, I overheard some first-year grad students discussing the day’s Spanish class. My eavesdropping turned out to be much more interesting than I had anticipated.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>speculative grammarian, satirical linguistics, linguistics, satire, humor, parody, linguistics, spanish, graduate school, morphology</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:duration>4:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure url="http://specgram.com/podcasts/CLV.1-05-Reanalysis-of-Spanish-by-Naive-Linguists.mp3" length="4683938" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Nasal-Ingressive Voiceless Velar Trill (Letters to the Editor)</title>
      <description>Letters to the Editor; From Volume CLI, Number 3 of Speculative Grammarian, July 2006. ——— To the most respected editors, In the fall I’ll be a first-year grad student in linguistics at R—— University. A couple of the current fourth-years told me that the International Phonetic Association was adding several new symbols for sounds that have previously been considered to have questionable status as phonemes. They said that the most contentious new addition was double-dot wide-O, a nasal-ingressive voiceless velar trill.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://specgram.com/CLI.3/02.letters.html</link>
      <guid>http://specgram.com/podcasts/CLI.3-02-Nasal-Ingressive-Voiceless-Velar-Trills.mp3</guid>
      <itunes:summary>Letters to the Editor; From Volume CLI, Number 3 of Speculative Grammarian, July 2006. ——— To the most respected editors, In the fall I’ll be a first-year grad student in linguistics at R—— University. A couple of the current fourth-years told me that the International Phonetic Association was adding several new symbols for sounds that have previously been considered to have questionable status as phonemes. They said that the most contentious new addition was double-dot wide-O, a nasal-ingressive voiceless velar trill.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>speculative grammarian, satirical linguistics, linguistics, satire, humor, parody, linguistics, graduate school, phonology</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:duration>1:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure url="http://specgram.com/podcasts/CLI.3-02-Nasal-Ingressive-Voiceless-Velar-Trills.mp3" length="1669765" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Where No Researcher Should Tread</title>
      <description>Where No Researcher Should Tread; By Cowell R. Augh, Ph.D.; From Volume CLVI, Number 3 of Speculative Grammarian, May 2009. ——— We, the linguistic community at large, owe a great deal of thanks to our esteemed colleague Quentin Popinjay Snodgrass for alerting us to the dangers of lexicalism. A hero of his stature doesn’t come along every day, and it would be wise of us to pay close attention to his advice—and, may I say, it is my general belief that many of us have done just that. There are those, however, who either remain ignorant of the horrors of lexicalism, or deny its ability to corrupt the minds of students and academics alike. “Everyone in my department abhors lexicalist theories of grammar!” chortles John T. Department Chair. “Why should I remain on guard?” In times of war (for, realistically, what is this if not warfare?), though, one must be prepared for anything—especially when the enemy appears in the guise of an ally: language itself!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://specgram.com/CLVI.3/07.augh.tread.html</link>
      <guid>http://specgram.com/podcasts/CLVI.3-07-Where-No-Researcher-Should-Tread.mp3</guid>
      <itunes:summary>Where No Researcher Should Tread; By Cowell R. Augh, Ph.D.; From Volume CLVI, Number 3 of Speculative Grammarian, May 2009. ——— We, the linguistic community at large, owe a great deal of thanks to our esteemed colleague Quentin Popinjay Snodgrass for alerting us to the dangers of lexicalism. A hero of his stature doesn’t come along every day, and it would be wise of us to pay close attention to his advice—and, may I say, it is my general belief that many of us have done just that. There are those, however, who either remain ignorant of the horrors of lexicalism, or deny its ability to corrupt the minds of students and academics alike. “Everyone in my department abhors lexicalist theories of grammar!” chortles John T. Department Chair. “Why should I remain on guard?” In times of war (for, realistically, what is this if not warfare?), though, one must be prepared for anything—especially when the enemy appears in the guise of an ally: language itself!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>speculative grammarian, satirical linguistics, linguistics, satire, humor, parody, linguistics, morphology, lexicalism</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:duration>7:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure url="http://specgram.com/podcasts/CLVI.3-07-Where-No-Researcher-Should-Tread.mp3" length="7577068" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The Effect of Coffee Consumption on Adults' Average MLU</title>
      <description>The Effect of Coffee Consumption on Adults’ Average MLU at the Breakfast Table; By Suzy X.; From Volume XVI, Number 3 of Psammeticus Quarterly, May 1989. ——— Dear Sirs: When Mommy fell asleep at the computer during her third straight all-nighter and accidentally erased her doctoral thesis, I wrote this to help her out. She graduated with honors, and so I thought I’d do a paper on it and send it to you, since I’ve heard it’s your kind of thing. Please do not print my full name with this article, because I am not allowed to use Mommy’s computer at all. Thanks, Suzy X.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://specgram.com/PsQ.XVI.3/04.x.mlu.html</link>
      <guid>http://specgram.com/podcasts/PsQ.XVI.3-04-The-Effect-of-Coffee-Consumption-on-Adults'-Average-MLU.mp3</guid>
      <itunes:summary>The Effect of Coffee Consumption on Adults’ Average MLU at the Breakfast Table; By Suzy X.; From Volume XVI, Number 3 of Psammeticus Quarterly, May 1989. ——— Dear Sirs: When Mommy fell asleep at the computer during her third straight all-nighter and accidentally erased her doctoral thesis, I wrote this to help her out. She graduated with honors, and so I thought I’d do a paper on it and send it to you, since I’ve heard it’s your kind of thing. Please do not print my full name with this article, because I am not allowed to use Mommy’s computer at all. Thanks, Suzy X.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>speculative grammarian, satirical linguistics, linguistics, satire, humor, parody, linguistics, mlu, mean length of utterance; developmental linguistics</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:duration>3:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure url="http://specgram.com/podcasts/PsQ.XVI.3-04-The-Effect-of-Coffee-Consumption-on-Adults'-Average-MLU.mp3" length="3367284" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>


  </channel>

</rss>
