Quotes: What People are Saying

Here are a few of our favorite things people have said about Speculative Grammarian over the years, collected wild on the internet, or domesticated in email.

Jump to page:  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22


Q1094. Needless to say, the descriptivists and prescriptivists have been fighting for years; in the academic English world, they are the Hatfields and McCoys, the Montagues and Capulets, the Sharks and Jets, the Blue Devils and Every Other Basketball Team. Now there is a movement that strives to cut the liguistic Gordian Knot by going the prescriptivists one better: The Original English Movement would return our language permanently to its form a millennium ago, at the time of the writing of Beowulf.

—The Good Reverend


Q1093. I’m howling!!

plasmodium farmer


Q1092. However, having said that I think there are untranslatable words, I don’t agree with some of those words. The can’t be translated? It is an article and certainly can be. In Spanish it is translated as el, for example. Schadenfreude? Epicaricacy or, for those who don’t think it a word..., “taking joy in another’s misery.” That is perfect. Laughing when someone slips on a banana peel, for example.

—Kalleh


Q1091. Toska in Russian means melancholy or boredom. You don’t have to know Russian, you just know how to use a Russian/English dictionary.

—Geoff


Q1090. Kääntäminen on tunnetusta vaikeaa, ellei täysin mahdotonta. Lukeutuuko tämä teksti mahdottomiksi kääntää englannista suomeksi?

—Ollenkaan?


Q1089. Kyllähän kyseistä tekstiä tietysti voisi "kääntää" suomeksi noin pilailumielessä, mutta eipä siinä olisi juuri mitään ideaa. Englanninkielinen teksti on nimittäin virheellistä kieltä, ja mahdollisen merkityksen esiin tonkiminen jää arvailujen varaan.

—onnistuisi


Q1088. Vilkaisin sivua lyhyehkösti ja sain sen käsityksen, että koko homma oli käännetty koneella jostakin muusta kielestä.

—paljon tekstiä


Q1087. I will admit that I seldom read SpecGram, as fans call it, since I don’t really enjoy its brand of humor, generally very dry, deadpan satire of academic writing and more specifically the discourse of descriptive and theoretical linguistics. This month, however, three different acquaintances commended the latest “Special Fieldwork Issue”.

On the principle of de gustibus non est disputandum and as your humble conduit, I present links to Speculative Grammarian’s Special Fieldwork Issue 1 (April 2010) and Special Fieldwork Issue 2 (May 2010). I did get a good chuckle from Elwin Ransom’s piece, “On the Applicability of Recent Theoretical Advances in Linguistics to the Practice of Fieldwork.” And really, what more can I demand for the price of my subscription?

—Chad Nilep


Q1086. ‘My love is like a colourless green simile...’heartrending linguistics poems especially for Valentine’s Day.

Babel


Q1085. Never noticed this particular little game on the site before...

—alynnidalar


Q1084. People into linguistics probably know this one already, but [I recommend] Strangecraft.

—rotting bones


Q1083. Do you want to learn the funny sino-roman alphabet? Here you can do it.

—Massimiliano B


Q1082. Juego para lingüistas en tardes lluviosas. En realidad, no, pero me he reído leyendolo. Pobre Chomsky.

Ander Egurtzegi


Q1081. My favourite [propaganda poster] is this sensitive portrait of the old-time theoretical linguist at work.

Andrew Hardie


Q1080. Oh, PLOS ONE! Das weltweit zweitbeste Linguistik-Magazin. Solideres Fachwissen hat nur SpecGram ;)

sanddrn


Q1079. It’s a shame the double-dot wide O never caught on as an IPA symbol. (Or the dectuple-struck Z, for that matter.)

Danchekker


Q1078. “The horse raced past the garden path fell.” *giggle*

Michael Aubrey


Q1077. Das ist der Humor der Linguisten. *g*

Wohlgesagt


Q1076. New desktop background.

ↁa₪ Simo₪so₪


Q1075. SpecGram is just damn good! I really love it! It helps me to survive all those dull papers and to retain a hope that linguistics does make fun sometimes.

Oliver


Q1074. I think Plato should have been translated more realistically.

Seabyrn


Q1073. This is for everyone who persists in posting those “untranslatable words” posts.

Jonathan Downie


Q1072. Thanks for the awesome stuff you do!

—Rowan Katzenmeyer


Q1071. ‘The horse raced past the garden path fell’, and other linguistic self-definers in SpecGram this month.

Mark Dingemanse


Q1070. Thank you [Madalena Cruz-Ferreira] for a true LOL experience reading [this] ... Highly recommend.

Joy Penard


Q1069. SpecGram is a blessing to the world.

—alynnidalar


Q1068. Geeking out with SpecGram’s Cartoon Theories of Linguistics!

James Venner


Q1067. “Everything psychologists wanted to know about linguistics but were afraid to ask” Do you dare?

Iker Erdocia


Q1066. For all you linguists who are just so tired of being asked that same question over and over...

Sarah McMonagle


Q1065. I’m personally fully in favour of jokelangs, especially those found from time to time within the pages of SpecGram.

frislander


Q1064. Der Unterschied zwischen der Phonetik und Phonologie ist anschaulich und zugleich unterhaltsam auf dieser Karikatur in der satirischen Online-Zeitschrift Speculative Grammarian (2007, 153-1) dargestellt.

Diana Šileikaitė-Kaishauri


Q1063. Speculative Grammarian is a notorious satirical linguistics site.

Darkgamma


Q1062. I read this thinking it was serious by accident.

Handsomeyellow47


Q1061. Seems like SpecGram has been around since the beginning of time. Or at least the beginning of grammar.

Joe Salmons


Q1060. Silly, artificial illustration of statistical machine translation.

Jon Dehdari


Q1059. May your adjectives always be superlatve.

Richard L. Moss


Q1058. What did I just read?

gokupwned5


Q1057. Thanks for the laughs!

Kiersten Henkel


Q1056. Speculate away! May your speculation never end!

Aya Katz


Q1055. Thank you for all of your linguistic quips.

Lauren Gattara Miller


Q1054. This is satire, lest anyone be fooled.

Darkgamma


Q1053. You can’t um and er your way towards an empire, if you want indecisiveness and fillers you should learn Greek.

—[deleted]


Q1052. This article, at a satirical linguistics website that I frequent, is pretty interestingsee if you can read it. It doesn’t require any knowledge of Chinese charactersit’s just a little visual “trick,” and after about 5 minutes, I was able to read it without problems.

CAVEAT DVMPTRVCK


Q1051. Speculative Grammarian / 言語学に関する笑えるネタや時として真面目な話を収録したオンラインの雑誌。難しいことを緩く語るのがコンセプトなのだろう。英語。

LingWebs Bot


Q1050. Speculative Grammarian is a collection of linguistic satire. There is a load of stuff there, but this set of puns caught my eye.

Sean Roberts


Q1049. Looking for a graphic illustration of the phonetic and phonology interface.

Look, I understand the basics of phonetics and phonology. Phonetics is a physical science and phonology is a psychological science, sort of. Nonetheless, they both treat the same object: linguistic sounds.

Is it possible to illustrate this interface to a naive and dimwitted undergrad?

Teusz


Q1048. I’ve always liked this illustration of the difference between phonetics and phonology.

Gaston Ümlaut


Q1047. I mean come on. AIs don’t even understand something like this yet.

lehyde


More ...


Last updated Dec. 23, 2017.