/nuz baɪts/ SpecGram Vol CLXXXIII, No 3 Contents The Nutritional Value of Phonemes—D. I. E. Titian & Vic Tuals

Linguimericks
Book ५८

New Yorkers debate metrosexuals,
While for Texans it was Metroplexuals.
In th’academy, though,
It’s different, you know,
So for Anglists it’s all retroflexuals.
—Pumptilian Perniquity


Of nominal tense, Guaraní
Makes use, and so naturally
Both once and future kings
Indeed are well-formed things
And ex-leaves do make the best tea.
—Κόμμα Ο᾿Κῶλον


What’s syntax? Words in combination
Or tightly constrained transformations?
Or simply a spandrel
The product of mental
Disorderor some god’s creation?
—Charles Deakens


Indecency everything taints:
It’s a subject of frequent complaints.
Whoever would think
That for optimal kink
There’s a website called “Rank My Constraints”?
—Pete Bleackley


Hibbledy quibbledy
Stop splitting hairs with me.
My issue’s based on prag-
matics alone.

Don’t confuse matters with
Morphophonology.
That isn’t why I said,
“Don’t use that tone!”
—Sandy! Sandhi! Sundaé!

/nuz baɪts/
The Nutritional Value of PhonemesD. I. E. Titian & Vic Tuals
SpecGram Vol CLXXXIII, No 3 Contents